Timeline: June 2008 to March 2009
Objective: The objectives of this review of systematic reviews were to:
- Identify and describe the type, time, and location of interventions that have a positive effect in reducing worker injury and disability after a musculoskeletal injury (MSI).
- Summarize main messages from the best available evidence for MSI-related injury and disability prevention in workers.
- Present further directions to stakeholders to help bridge the gap between research findings and prevention practices currently in place.
Findings: The systematic reviews analyzed in this review included a variety of key findings:
- Type of Intervention: There were a number of interventions mentioned in the literature. Stay-at-Work and Return-to-Work interventions are the most widely practiced (Shaw, 2008 & Liddle, 2007). Multidisciplinary interventions are also effective, especially on chronic back pain duration (Van Geen, 2007 & Karjalainen, 2003).
- Time of Intervention: Early intervention and the detailed delegation of key roles and responsibilities are central in ensuring a smooth-flowing intervention program.
- Location of Intervention: Most interventions are integrated between workplace and the healthcare system, and communication between all parties is necessary for the intervention to move smoothly (ACOEM, 2006 & Franche, 2005).
- Main Messages from Best Available Evidence: Stakeholder involvement is extremely important and communication between workers, employers, and stakeholders is needed in the RTW process.
Principal Investigator: Hannah Rose, OHSAH
Co-Investigators: Dr. Jaime Guzman, OHSAH; Noushin Khushrushahi, OHSAH
Last Updated: April 28, 2009.


